Friday, November 16, 2012

43trillion dollars laundered, at the cost of 2 childrens lives

 
This week financial news organization CNBC gave some mainstream attention to the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History, in which “Banksters” and their U.S. racketeering partners are being accused of laundering of 43 trillion dollars worth of ill gotten gains.
The lawsuit is said to involve officials located in the highest offices of government and the financial sector.
Since this information was surprisingly revealed by the mainstream news organization there has been a very suspicious and deadly fallout at the CNBC headquarters.
Within hours the original page for the article was taken down, and CNBC senior vice president Kevin Krim received news that his children were killed under very suspicious circumstances.
It seems that the murder happened first and then the page was removed later.
According to mainstream accounts the children’s nanny is responsible for the murders, allegedly stabbing both children. However, those same mainstream news sources report the highly unlikely story that the nanny slit her own throat just after committing the homicides.
Police have released very little information and although a wider plot has not been officially implicated, it seems very possible that these murders are a show of force against the press organization for releasing such damning information about the most powerful people in the world.
Here is some more information about the lawsuit from the Wall Street Journal:
“In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP — on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws — has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) by the “Banksters” and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and
audits of all the “bailout programs” by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other “bailout money” advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress.
Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the “Banksters” criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama’s campaign from these same “Banksters” to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national
banks included among the “Bankster” Defendants. “
Some of the alleged conspirators are Attorney General Holder, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary, Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former “communications director” for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits.
It is expected that all news on this subject will be removed from CNBC, and that other news organizations will be discouraged from covering such information.
However, screen shots of the original CNBC article were taken to verify the authenticity of this story.
Assassination and brute intimidation are common strategies for the ruling class to use on people who may threaten their agenda.
This is the second situation this week in which a high level executive was the victim of a suspicious attack that seemed very much like an assassination.
The Intel Hub justreported that Nicholas Mockford, a 60 year old British executive for the oil company ExxonMobil was shot dead in front of his wife in an assassination-style killing in Brussels.
We will be keeping a close eye on both of these stories and provide more details as they become available.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-and-their-comrade-capitalists-targets-of-spire-law-group-llps-racketeering-and-money-laundering-lawsuit-seeking-return-of-43-trillion-to-the-united-states-treasury-2012-10-25
http://spire-law.com/
http://www.usalawyer.org/spire-law-group-llp-usa-government-43-trillion-lawsuit/
http://theintelhub.com/2012/10/27/cnbc-execs-children-murdered-1-day-after-cnbc-reports-43-trillion-bankster-lawsuit/
http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-administration-facing-massive-federal-lawsuit/

Monday, November 12, 2012

CNBC forced to pull article exposing 43 trillion dollar theft. 3 people murdered.

This week financial news organization CNBC gave some mainstream attention to the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History, in which “Banksters” and their U.S. racketeering partners are being accused of laundering of 43 trillion dollars worth of ill gotten gains.
The lawsuit is said to involve officials located in the highest offices of government and the financial sector.
Since this information was surprisingly revealed by the mainstream news organization there has been a very suspicious and deadly fallout at the CNBC headquarters.
Within hours the original page for the article was taken down, and CNBC senior vice president Kevin Krim received news that his children were killed under very suspicious circumstances.
It seems that the murder happened first and then the page was removed later.
According to mainstream accounts the children’s nanny is responsible for the murders, allegedly stabbing both children. However, those same mainstream news sources report the highly unlikely story that the nanny slit her own throat just after committing the homicides.
Police have released very little information and although a wider plot has not been officially implicated, it seems very possible that these murders are a show of force against the press organization for releasing such damning information about the most powerful people in the world.
Here is some more information about the lawsuit from the Wall Street Journal:
“In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP — on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws — has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) by the “Banksters” and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and
audits of all the “bailout programs” by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other “bailout money” advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress.
Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the “Banksters” criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama’s campaign from these same “Banksters” to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national
banks included among the “Bankster” Defendants. “
Some of the alleged conspirators are Attorney General Holder, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary, Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former “communications director” for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits.
It is expected that all news on this subject will be removed from CNBC, and that other news organizations will be discouraged from covering such information.
However, screen shots of the original CNBC article were taken to verify the authenticity of this story.
Assassination and brute intimidation are common strategies for the ruling class to use on people who may threaten their agenda.
This is the second situation this week in which a high level executive was the victim of a suspicious attack that seemed very much like an assassination.
The Intel Hub justreported that Nicholas Mockford, a 60 year old British executive for the oil company ExxonMobil was shot dead in front of his wife in an assassination-style killing in Brussels.
We will be keeping a close eye on both of these stories and provide more details as they become available.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-and-their-comrade-capitalists-targets-of-spire-law-group-llps-racketeering-and-money-laundering-lawsuit-seeking-return-of-43-trillion-to-the-united-states-treasury-2012-10-25
http://spire-law.com/
http://www.usalawyer.org/spire-law-group-llp-usa-government-43-trillion-lawsuit/
http://theintelhub.com/2012/10/27/cnbc-execs-children-murdered-1-day-after-cnbc-reports-43-trillion-bankster-lawsuit/
http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-administration-facing-massive-federal-lawsuit/

Monday, September 24, 2012

The War against Truth waged by a deceived American population and complicit media. Are the leftist tactics working?

Our internet sources for truth in reporting are seriously being comprimised constantly. Attacks using frivilous subjects to inflame instead of concentrating on the more serious ones are the going trend especially on newsvine by non Americans. And yet we still flock to them.

Actually Obama just Farted

This blatent obscuring of facts from supposedly trusted sites as well as the spin is getting out of hand.

Our own supreme court has been complicit in the path of destruction Americans face today as is shown in an article posted below in a link I provided. The overwhelming amount of disinformation has mainly been from the far left media outlets like Media Matters, The Daily Kos, Huffpost, Snopes, Factcheck, MSNBC, CNN,ABC and NBC. There are more but most know who they are. Fox is also guilty by omission and a lesser amount of spin compared to the others. All the major networks are guilty from not telling the truth about Islam but that's a different subject for a different article.

Ommission of information is the same as disinformation.

Oversaturation of false informational spin is infectious and dangerous to our nation. It is so prevelent and repeated so much that there are people who actually start to believe it and fail to see the real truth.

Newsvine is a perfect example of this retoric described as truth in action. In my short time there I have observed the following as well as expierienced it firsthand. When the majority here (which happens to be left leaning) say it, then it must be true and it is backed up by others of like mind backslaping each other as if their doing so proves the falsehood true, at the same time calling anyone who has a different opinion from theirs a racist bigot who hasn't gotten out of grammar school yet. Of course this comes from the right as well but not nearly as much as from the dominant left since there are far more liberals on this site than conservatives or republicans. More does not necessarily mean there opinions are more valuable or true than the few.

When these extreme leaning people (right or left) get proven wrong they go into defense mode by attacking the person who posted the article as well as the source instead of actually doing the research to find out if the source was credible or not on their own. They rarely even mention the contents the article is about. Is this laziness or is this just their way of debating?. A lot of these people don't contribute anything of substance that pertain to the article being talked about and instead just post a comment that attacks a person in another comment just because they don't like the opinion or the person who's comment they attack. Those are the ones that believe that anybody else's opinion is absolutely wrong even if it is actually right. I believe the term used for such people are called Trolls. And there are many on Newsvine as their are on other blogsites.

Some here can see through the lies and deceptions clearly, including some of those on the left. There are more than likely a lot more on the left that side more with the right (or conservatives) but will not for fear of being mocked or alienated by their leftist peers. Those will just not comment at all if the subject is too revealing. I can't say that I blame them. This goes for both sides of course.

Those are the enlightened ones who along with their enlightened brethren in the center prefer to show proof of their positions by posting links to the evidence that they base their information from. The very links that the others refuse to open and read. Most of those enlightened people do research from various different outlets on the Internet not just to find something that proves their point but from places that have the most credible information that is available and verifiable at the time. These people are the ones singled out by other posters for attack by inults through insinuation, harrassment and stalking in order to get around the rules that Newsvine has in place as well as collapsing the coments or articles just because they don't like them. I expect to get a lot of flack from the left on this but someone had to write about what is going on there. I wrote this article there and did a little tweaking to it to post it here for clarity.

Just to let others know, I am an Independent. It is time to stop the above mentioned tactics and get our country going back in the right direction regardless of petty differences. Right now we are self destructing and the partisan politics needs to stop. Political correctness is the worst enemy to a free Republic. Our media cannot be relied on anymore and that is true no matter what political point of view one may have. If we don't pull together we will lose every right we have and become a Socialist nation and the freedoms we have will be lost forever.

Here is a perfect example of a site that ommitted information and claimes it did not exist when is actually did.

http://grendelreport.blogspot.com/2012/06/time-to-suspect-snopescom-is-negating.html

It has links within links going to the proper places to show this actually happened. It is my opinion that most of those reading this article will not take the time to dig deeper. It is so much easier to claim the article is another right wing nut piece spread by Rush followers.

For the sake of continuity I left the opening paragraph below to lay the ground rules on the comments.

As usual the code of honor will be enforced. Even though political correctness is something I dislike, the rules of this site have to be adhered to. Derogatory terms such as Tbags, Demothugs, Republithugs or any variation will be deleted regardless if it is on topic in order to keep tempers from flaring causing derails. Use common sense please. You are welcome to repost it without the derogatory connotations if your comment gets deleted. Your opinion is welcome as long as it pertains to the point of the article and not an attack on another poster. Posts that get deleted can be taken up with the vine moderators, (when and if they decide to grace this article since they are overloaded with the Beta site).

I am an American citizen and I approve this message! Violators will be prostituted. (pun intended)

Friday, September 7, 2012

The end of an Error, The fall of the Obama empire


  • When did Beijing become our "closest" ally? What about Israel a country that has never failed to support us. What about Great Britain? Remember them...that is where he likes to blame Romney for his statements that were actually proven true on the Olympics. Why does he do this? To cover the disgraceful blunders he made in regards to their Queen, his spitting on of Winston Churchill, and his magnanimous Sams Club DVD gift set and IPOD loaded with "his" favorite songs.

    GM Bailout a dismal failure costing Americans $28 billion dollars.

    Osama technically is better off, he no longer has to listen as Obama give the same speech for four years. He should be thanking Seal Team Six from hell for this.

    Overseas jobs...after the failed auto bailout GM opened plants stimulating the economy...the economies of Mexico and China as they built factories there. Sending
    $22 million dollars of U.S. tax payer dollars to repay campaign debts to George Soros in Brazil.

    Authorizing a low flying photo-op over a U.S. city attacked in such a manner just years before that killed over 3000 people.

    Endorsing and supporting the Islam terrorists as he attempts to supplant the laws of the United States with this cults barbaric rituals of hate and death. As they attempt to remove God from this country and supplant him with a pedophile prophet and butcher.

    Appointing the above mentioned terrorists in key positions inside the very bastion of freedom that has stood for everything they despise. CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood hailed by Democrats as the purveyors of science and navigation...yet every country they are dominant lies in a state of barbarism and below third world poverty where murder and the rape of women, children, and homosexuals are the order of the day.

    Opening our borders under the false "Dream Act:" that allows illegal "aliens" to rape and murder innocent American children. Allowing them to recklessly run down in drunken stupors Americans...no identification needed for that either. That would be "racist".

    Attempting to cover up his complicity and his paid assassin Eric Holders complicity to pursue a liberal agenda to deprive American citizens of the one thing that protects them against their tyranny...the Second Amendment. Maybe someone should ask Brian Terry if he is better off today than he was four years ago. As well as hundreds of Mexican citizens killed over this blood thirsty administrations warped agendas.

    Failed Green jobs...repeat after me..."Solyndra".

    Destroying the three branches of the Government our Founding Fathers put in place to prevent such blatant acts of despotism and tyranny to impose "his" will.

    He has made of this country once respected a global laughing stock as he bumbles his amateur worldwide failed agenda.

    His endorsement of the New Black Panther Party in his mantle of "unifier" as he racially divides the country. Letting them intimidate voters and threaten with death
    of all whites from babies on up with racial cleansing.

    His endorsement of voter fraud as it serves his purpose as he bastardizes the American electoral process.

    Leaking vital secrets to his Russian allies and the enemies of Israel in a blatant attempt to sabotage their attempts to protect themseves from the enemies that
    surround them on all sides...Palestine, Iran, Egypt.

    His unlawful endorsement of signing into law the unlawful detention of United States citizens.

    His gross multi-million dollar cover-up of his documents that would prove he is not eligible to serve in the office of the President according to our Constitution.

    His madating requiring Americans of faith to be complicit in the murders of countless unborn innocents.

    His passage of a Universal Healthcare mandate bribed and brokered behind closed doors that will deny millions of Americans proper healthcare they pay for while

    illegal "aliens" rape and steal their entitlements given to them by this sham of a President.

    His appointments of Czars not qualified to clean rest stop restrooms in key positions to cover up his own gross incompetence and arrogant misplaced narcism.

    His and his disgusting wifes lavish tax payer funded White House Parties, multi-million dollar vacations, golf rounds while Americans lose their homes and their children starve.

    His spitting on of the sacrifices of our military as he removes their rights to free speech, healthcare, and right to vote they shed blood for us to allow us to retain.

    These idiots have the gall to get up at the DNC and blatatantly lie to the American people when their disgusting actions are the only transparency we have ever
    seen from them. Maybe after Bill Clinton (A man known for the integrity of his word.) gave his propganda and evidently paid for speech, he should have had Obama come out dressed in the appropriate attire for his loving hug...a blue dress perhaps?

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Those Wacky Liberals!

Those Wacky Liberals

Posted with permission of the author.



Those Wacky Liberals

Up for jumping out of a plane without a parachute? You’re probably a liberal. How about diving into a vat full of poisonous snakes? Yep, recent studies suggest you probably have liberal tendencies. It all brings to mind the question my mother used to ask me about whether I’d jump off a bridge if so and so told/dared me to or, in another version, if “everyone else” was jumping. She’d ask in a tone which clearly indicated her belief that the correct response was obvious, but I guess she didn’t realize it all really depended on whether I had a conservative or a liberal brain. I would suggest that a true liberal would answer in the affirmative based on two of the primary characteristics of the liberal brain. It seems that for some reason liberals tend to have a smaller amygdalas, (a particular area of the brain involved in the decision making process), then conservatives and thus are less likely to properly assess risk prior to taking action. Interestingly, much of the liberal media has defined this ability to properly assess risk as evidencing “fearful” behavior, rather than acknowledging that ignoring the possibility of negative consequences is a good way to make a bad decision.
The reality is that the more reasonable interpretation of such data is to suggest that when one chooses not to consider all the possible consequences of a particular action the decision making process is absent and that a liberal simply combines thought and action. If one couples this propensity for acting without thinking with the fact that liberals are far more herd like in their behavior one begins to understand why it is that liberals often have such a negative emotional response to conservatives and the conservative world view. One need only combine the liberal propensity to act without thinking with the tendency to follow the crowd to come up with the related conclusion that liberals will, by and large, jump off that bridge referenced above.
This all suggests that the liberal view might best be summarized by the Nike slogan, “Just do it” which obviously suggests that, for example, the important thing is to shoot the arrow regardless of whether the archer has a particular target in mind. It seems that it’s not just a matter of a smaller amygdalas, but there is also evidence that liberals are much more likely to possess the DRD4-7R gene which significantly affects the relationship between mood and behavior. Essentially, engaging in risky behavior elevates the mood of those with the gene and thus it motivates them to search out the new and the dangerous with their sole focus being on the “high” they receive and a complete absence of any consideration being given to the possibility of more far-reaching negative consequences.
The truth of the matter is that Democrats/liberals tend to take positions on an issue by issue basis while drawing from a much more limited set of moral and ethical premises then do Republican/conservatives. Jonathan “Haidt, a self-professed liberal atheist”, explicitly suggests as much when he claims,
We think of the moral mind as being like an audio equalizer, with five slider switches for different parts of the moral spectrum. Democrats generally use a much smaller part of the spectrum than do Republicans. The resulting music may sound beautiful to other Democrats, but it sounds thin and incomplete to many of the swing voters that left the party in the 1980s, and whom the Democrats must recapture if they want to produce a lasting political realignment.
The irony is, or course, that even in defining the results of the various studies purporting to show the differences between the conservative and liberal brain the primarily liberal media evidences just those very characteristics. I recently wrote an article aimed at illustrating that very thing, liberals have a propensity to misrepresent what they do not understand based on their inability to incorporate what they mistakenly believe to be conflicting positions into one cohesive and comprehensible system. They pick and choose from a wide array of relevant data and claim that their conclusions are valid when the fact of the matter is that by ignoring the data which conflicts with their particular world view they completely invalidate those conclusions. Perhaps the most ironic result is that they then claim that conservatives are the ones who are unable to assess and incorporate conflicting data and, further, that conservatives are “against science” and close minded.
In conclusion, if one accepts all the data presented by the various studies as accurate and meaningful, a completely different issue, one finds that the conclusions being presented as true by the various authors and commentators addressing the subject of the liberal/conservative brain are almost invariably completely and utterly false. This is almost completely a result of the very characteristics defining the liberal brain which are presented in the studies themselves. In the end, perhaps my biggest question is why so few conservative commentators seem willing to point this out. As with much of what passes as political discourse in this day and age they seem content to allow the issue to be framed within a liberal context and then wonder why it is they can’t seem to get any traction.
Arguing over whether or not conservatives are close-minded, for example, is really a fool’s game and simply solidifies the validity of the invalid paradigm of the left. I would suggest that the real issue confronting the American Citizenry is whether it prefers to be led by those who are driven by the need to make changes regardless of the effect those changes may have or whether it wishes to be led by those who change what needs to be changed, leave alone those things which do not need to be changed, and make those decisions based on relevant and pertinent data. The choice is up to you.
The daredevil who just wants change or the fundamentally rational person?
Below I provide quotes and references which provided the basic data for the article.
Thank you.
while conservatives are though to be better at recognizing threats, researchers said.

Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2011/04/08/liberal-vs-conservative-does-the-difference-lie-in-the-brain/#ixzz256j4DK7k
a “liberal gene” — a variant called DRD4-7R, which affects the neurotransmitter dopamine — that has been linked with a personality type driven to seek out new experiences.

Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2011/04/08/liberal-vs-conservative-does-the-difference-lie-in-the-brain/#ixzz256jHoH00
The conservative reluctance seems more understandable when looking at studies that associate personality and politics, which have been ongoing for decades. A good example comes from a 1950 study, in which right-wing types were identified as “rigid, conventional, intolerant, xenophobic and obedient.” (Left-wingers are typically assigned much more palatable adjectives like flexible and curious.)
In recent years, the dividing point has become open-mindedness, which suggests conservatives are, unflatteringly, defined by being closed-minded. “Every bad trait you can imagine has been laid at the doors of conservatives,” says Hibbing. “So I don’t blame them for being on guard.” (Of course, each attribute is what researchers make of it. An intolerant, conventional person might also be called a careful, orderly one.)

Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2010/12/21/the-biology-of-politics-what-makes-a-liberal-or-conservative/#ixzz256pqXBKq

This gene variation has already been linked to a personality type driven to seek out new experiences. In other words, people with the DRD4-7R gene are more likely to be game for a laugh, for a dare, for anything new and stimulating “to alter dopamine levels to affect mood,” explain the authors. (More on Time.com: What Goes on Inside the Brain of a Misbehaving Boy?)

Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2010/10/28/never-mind-the-tea-party-can-a-liberal-gene-make-you-a-party-animal/#ixzz256mnVAXM
They suspected that DRD4-7R-equipped novelty-seekers would listen more closely to the views of friends and would also acquire a wider circle of friends, exposing these embryonic Keith Olbermanns and Jon Stewarts to yet more points of view, attitudes and lifestyles. This exposure would further tease out their inner liberal.

Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2010/10/28/never-mind-the-tea-party-can-a-liberal-gene-make-you-a-party-animal/#ixzz256n1d1HV

While having the gene won’t make you liberal and having a rich social life won’t do so either, the interaction of the two may well do the trick. “Ten friends can move a person with two copies of the 7R [variant] almost halfway from being conservative to moderate or from being moderate to liberal,” the study concludes.

Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2010/10/28/never-mind-the-tea-party-can-a-liberal-gene-make-you-a-party-animal/#ixzz256nG0vRD

In a study led by Yuko Munakata, professor of psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder, investigators presented subjects with a random noun and asked them to pair a verb with it. In choice situations like this, brain cells in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex are designed to consider a wide range of options—essentially conducting a high-speed argument among themselves. The debate would go on forever, except chemical inhibitors soon silence things, allowing only one option to prevail.

Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2010/09/14/want-to-make-quicker-decisions-muzzle-your-brain/#ixzz256rtpVf1

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Martial law powers given to Obama, The threat to our freedom!

An Executive Order You Should Know About
Mar 30, 2012Issues: Defense, Global War on Terror
Dear Friend,
With all that is going in Washington these days some things don’t make the news the way they should. Fourteen days ago President Obama issued an Executive Order that you should know about. This order gives an unprecedented level of authority to the President and the federal government to take over all the fundamental parts of our economy - in the name of national security - in times of national emergency.
This means all of our water resources, construction services and materials (steel, concrete, etc.), our civil transportation system, food and health resources, our energy supplies including oil and natural gas – even farm equipment – can be taken over by the President and his cabinet secretaries. The Government can also draft U.S. citizens into the military and force U.S. citizens to fulfill "labor requirements" for the purposes of "national defense." There is not even any Congressional oversight, only briefings are required.
By issuing this as an Executive Order the President puts the federal government above the law, which, in a democracy, is never supposed to happen.

As President and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, he has the Constitutional authority to issue executive orders. And while similar orders have been made before by presidents from Eisenhower and Reagan to Clinton and George Bush – it has never been done to this extent.

It is still unclear why this order was signed now, and what the consequences are for our nation – especially during times of peace. This type of Martial Law imposes a government takeover on U.S. citizens that is typically reserved for national emergencies, not in a time of relative peace.

I want you to know I am following this very closely. If you would like to read the order for yourself please click here.

Sincerely,

Kay Granger
Member of Congress

Sunday, August 19, 2012

A BLACK TROJAN HORSE IN THE WHITEHOUSE

A Black man's point of view.
By Lloyd Marcus



As millions of my fellow Americans, I am outraged, devastated and extremely angry by the democrat's unbelievable arrogance and disdain for We The People. Despite our screaming "no" from the rooftops, they forced Obamacare down our throats. Please forgive me for using the following crude saying, but it is very appropriate to describe what has happened. "Don't urinate on me and tell me it's raining." Democrats say their mission is to give all Americans health care. The democrats are lying. Signing Obamacare into law against our will and the Constitution is tyranny and step one of their hideous goal of having as many Americans as possible dependent on government, thus controlling our lives and fulfilling Obama's promise to fundamentally transform America .

I keep asking myself. How did our government move so far from the normal procedures of getting things done? Could a white president have so successfully pulled off shredding the Constitution to further his agenda? I think not.

Ironically, proving America is completely the opposite of the evil racist country they relentlessly accuse her of being, progressives used America 's goodness, guilt and sense of fair play against her. In their quest to destroy America as we know it, progressives borrowed a brilliant scheme from Greek mythology. They offered America a modern day Trojan Horse, a beautifully crafted golden shiny new black man as a presidential candidate. Democrat Joe Biden lauded Obama as the first clean and articulate African American candidate. Democrat Harry Reid said Obama only uses a black dialect when he wants.

White America relished the opportunity to vote for a black man naively believing they would never suffer the pain of being called racist again. Black Americans viewed casting their vote for Obama as the ultimate Affirmative Action for America 's sins of the past.

Then there were the entitlement loser voters who said, "I'm votin' for the black dude who promises to take from those rich SOBs and give to me."

Just as the deceived Trojans dragged the beautifully crafted Trojan Horse into Troy as a symbol of their victory, deceived Americans embraced the progressive's young, handsome, articulate and so called moderate black presidential candidate as a symbol of their liberation from accusation of being a racist nation. Also like the Trojan Horse, Obama was filled with the enemy hiding inside.

Sunday, March 21, 2010, a secret door opened in Obama, the shiny golden black man. A raging army of democrats charged out. Without mercy, they began their vicious bloody slaughter of every value, freedom and institution we Americans hold dear; launching the end of America as we know it.

Wielding swords of votes reeking with the putrid odor of back door deals, the democrats landed a severe death blow to America and individual rights by passing Obamacare.

The mainstream liberal media has been relentlessly badgering the Tea Party movement with accusations of racism. Because I am a black tea party patriot, I am bombarded with interviewers asking me the same veiled question. "Why are you siding with these white racists against America 's first African American president?" I defend my fellow patriots who are white stating, These patriots do not give a hoot about Obama's skin color. They simply love their country and oppose his radical agenda. Obama's race is not an issue."

Recently, I have come to believe that perhaps I am wrong about Obama's race not being an issue. In reality, Obama's presidency has everything to do with racism, but not from the Tea Party movement. Progressives and Obama have exploited his race from the rookie senator's virtually unchallenged presidential campaign to his unprecedented bullying of America into Obamacare. Obama's race trumped all normal media scrutiny of him as a presidential candidate and most recently even the Constitution of the United States . Obamacare forces all Americans to purchase health care which is clearly unconstitutional.

No white president could get away with boldly and arrogantly thwarting the will of the American people and ignoring laws. President Clinton tried universal health care. Bush tried social security reform. The American people said "No" to both presidents' proposals and it was the end of it. So how can Obama get away with giving the American people "the finger?" The answer: He is black.

The mainstream liberal media continues to portray all who oppose Obama in any way as racist. Despite a list of failed policies, overreaches into the private sector, violations of the Constitution and planned destructive legislation too numerous to mention in this article, many Americans are still fearful of criticizing our first black president. Incredible.

My fellow Americans, you must not continue to allow yourselves to be "played" and intimidated by Obama's race or the historical context of his presidency. If we are to save America , the greatest nation on the planet, Obama must be defeated.

SHARE THIS WITH AMERICA ! !